Showing posts with label murder for hire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label murder for hire. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

How many black boys have to die? (Berkeley)

CC Liu, Crystal Quintero (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly; Assistant Director Stephen Menendian, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society (berkeley.edu, August. 14, 2014)
UC Berkeley campus tower overlooking San Francisco and Bay Bridge (berkeleyside.com)
 
How Many Black Boys Have to Die? Berkeley Faculty weigh in
Stephen Menendian
Menendian
Although the “facts” are still coming out [and the police cover up is well underway], we can add Michael Brown of Ferguson, Missouri to the list of young black men and boys killed by overzealous police or armed civilians:
 
Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, Sean Bell, Amadou Diallo, Oscar Grant, Jordan Davis, and so many more, including young women like Renisha McBride.
 
The ultimate tragedy is that each of these deaths seems to have done little to prevent the next [senseless police killing]. As I wrote two years ago, each death reopens a conversation on race framed to ask all of the wrong questions.
 
I predicted that “until we start asking the right questions, I fear there will be more Trayvon Martins.”
 
This list reminds us that these deaths are not isolated incidents, but part of a larger pattern -- a picture we can only make out if we step back for a broader view. A series of similar incidents occurred across the nation in the late 1960s, triggering the “urban disturbances” that were the focus of the famous “Kerner Commission” Report on Civil Disorders.”
 
The report is as startling in its description and analysis of events that parallel today as it is in the relevance of the recommendations it advanced.
 
The Commission was established for the specific purpose of investigating the causes of the late 1960s riots, and the Report is a comprehensive analysis of both the specific incidents at issue and the more general conditions that led to the combustible environment.
 

 
Policing
Consider the chapter dedicated to the issue of policing and the community, described as a “primary cause” of the “disorders” surveyed in the Report. The Report observed that “[t]he patrolman comes to see the city through a windshield and hear about it over a police radio. To him, the area increasingly comes to consist only of law breakers. To the ghetto resident, the policeman comes increasingly to be only an enforcer.”
 
The Kerner Commission Report expressed concern that many police neither reside nor grew up in these environments, widening the gulf between police and the communities they serve.
 
This remains the case today, with no more vivid an illustration that Ferguson, Missouri. Ferguson is a predominantly black community, and yet just three of the fifty-three police officers on the municipal force are African-American.
 
Consider, especially, the remarks of the 1968 authors of the Report when they assert that the incidents it documented were not “the crude acts of an earlier time,” alluding to explicitly racist police behavior, but that police misconduct -- whether described as brutality, harassment, or merely verbal abuse and discourtesy -- was a motivating factor that contributed to the civil disorders of that decade.
 
Protests in Ferguson, MO after an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, was shot and killed by Ferguson police. Photo credit: Southern Poverty Law Center
Line of peaceful protesters in Ferguson, MO, after an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, was shot to death by Ferguson police (Southern Poverty Law Center).
 
In the context of the era of stop-and-frisk (83 percent stopped were black or Hispanic), and the criminalization of poverty, it’s worth considering the applicability Commission’s observation, nearly 50 years later, that “Negroes firmly believe that police brutality and harassment occur repeatedly in Negro neighborhoods.”
 
The explanation for what’s happening is not a secret, but it doesn’t seem to have seeped into the broader consciousness.
 
In his 2005 book Blink, Malcolm Gladwell deconstructed the shooting of the unarmed Amadou Diallo in New York City, and explained the critical causal force, implicit or unconscious bias, as measured by the implicit association test.
 
Most Americans, even those who embrace egalitarian norms, harbor unconscious negative associations with black bodies. It is on account of these pervasive and yet unconscious, culturally embedded associations that black boys are not only automatically viewed with suspicion, but as criminals, regardless of who they are. The Internet meme #iftheygunnedmedown not only illustrates the portrayal of black men and boys, but the perception as well.
 
We need to begin by addressing the pervasiveness of these unconscious biases, first by acknowledging them, and secondly by working to reduce them or ameliorate their impact. Police academies and law enforcement agencies not only need more diverse staff, but they need implicit bias training for officers. They need to measure, track and address implicit bias, enhance officer supervision and create accountability measures.
 
Only efforts like these can repair and strengthen the relationship between law enforcement and communities of color that will ultimately prevent the senseless deaths of boys like Michael Brown and more, I fear, to come. More (comments)

Friday, 8 August 2014

"The Kill Team" U.S. in Afghanistan (film)



Why do we as Americans kill around the world? We join "kill teams" and commit atrocities and, rarely, we get prosecuted for it. Why does our government do it to us, leading us to our worst potential as human beings? It is -- as revealed by the high ranking U.S. military man Smedley Butler -- because WAR IS A RACKET!

WARNING: Graphic photos and candid discussion of killing not in warfare but for amusement!

Cover(The Young Turks) Ben Mankiewicz, Wes Clark Jr., and Michael Shure discuss a new report in Rolling Stone magazine about a "rogue" U.S. military Kill Team in Afghanistan that sought out and murdered helpless civilians for fun and terrorist glory. At Minute 2:37 the American soldiers seem to have done more to this child than murdered him: homosexual rape is indicated by removed trousers and blood stains. Do Americans really commit war crimes and crimes against humanity? Do they really chop off fingers (Angulimala- and War on Vietnam-style) and keep them as "trophies" of their murders? Do American soldiers develop PTSD? Moral injuries? Savagery while hypocritically calling innocent Afghans trying to defend themselves and their families against another brutal invasion "barbarians"?

Friday, 17 January 2014

The First Precept: abstain from killing (sutra)

Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly; Ven. Abbot Thanissaro, Metta Forest Monastery, San Diego, California, "Getting the Message" from Purity of Heart
Man viciously attacked by bull after lightly taunting the animal and gently inserting knives into its back while attempting to slaughter him for the crowd's blood lust and amusement (Gustavo Cuevas/i.cdn.turner.com)
 
You'd kill her, but would you -- y'know -- her?
"What is unskillful (unwholesome, karmically unprofitable)?
  1. Taking life (killing) is unskillful,
  2. taking what is not given... 
  3. sexual misconduct... 
  4. perjury...
  5. abusive speech...
  6. divisiveness... 
  7. idle chatter is unskillful. 
  8. Greed... 
  9. ill will... 
  10. wrong view is unskillful.
"These (ten) things are unskillful... What is skillful (wholesome, karmically profitable)? Refraining
  1. from taking life...
  2. from taking what is not given...
  3. from sexual misconduct...
  4. from perjury...
  5. from abusive speech...
  6. from divisiveness...
  7. from idle chatter...
  8. from covetousness... 
  9. from ill will... 
  10. from wrong view is skillful. 
"These things are skillful." — MN 9
The result of our cruelty rarely comes so quickly.
Killing is NEVER skillful. Stealing... holding a wrong view is never skillful. When asked if there were any killing he approved of, the Buddha answered that there was only one: anger.

[That is to say, one should destroy the root motivation, the underlying intention -- which is aversion -- to harm or destroy living beings.]
 
In no recorded instance did the Buddha approve of killing any living being. Once when a Buddhist monk went to an executioner and told the man to kill his victims compassionately -- that is, with one blow, rather than torturing them by multiple strikes -- the Buddha expelled that monk from the Order (Sangha) on the grounds that even the recommendation to kill compassionately is nevertheless a recommendation to kill -- something this Dharma never condones.
  • [Similarly, according to the monastic rules (vinaya), if one eats meat from an animal one sees, hears, or so much as suspects was killed for one's benefit, or to make an offering to one, is a violation on the grounds that it is tacit approval of killing. Moreover, if one recommends or speaks in praise of abortion or suicide or euthanasia, and life is taken as a result, one is guilty of killing and expelled from the Order. Why? Killing is weighty karma, very bad karma, and the Buddha went to great lengths to make this known. In ancient India he was known as a karma-vadin, a teacher of the consequences of physical, verbal, and mental action.]
Kill. Kill. Kill. And make us rich (BBC).
If a monastic were ever physically attacked, the Buddha allowed for that person to strike back in self-defense, but never with the intention of killing an assailant. 
 
As the Buddha taught monastics, "Even if highway robbers were to dismember one savagely, limb by limb, with a two-handled saw, anyone who would allow one's heart to become hateful and angry on account of it would not be following my Teaching. Even then one should train oneself: 

Even reviled dictator could act kindly (iln).
"'Our minds will not be affected, and we will not give vent to hateful words. Instead, we will remain sympathetic, with a mind/heart full of compassion [perhaps for the results they will one day face for their karma], and free of hate. 

"'We will pervade even these bandits with a consciousness imbued with good will. And beginning with them we will continue to pervade the world in all quarters with a consciousness imbued with good will -- abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, and free from ill will.' That is how one should train oneself." — ("The Parable of the Saw," MN 21)

The Parable of the Saw
Acharya Buddharakkhita (Positive Response) edited by Wisdom Quarterly
The Buddha, Gandhara/Afghanistan (Boonlieng/flickr)
"Meditators, even if bandits were to savagely sever you, limb by limb, with a double-handled saw, even then, whoever harbors ill will at heart would not be upholding my Teaching

"Meditators, even in such a situation, train yourselves: 'Neither shall our minds be affected by this, nor for this matter shall we give vent to hateful words, but we shall remain full of concern and pity (mudita, sympathy, compassion), with a mind of love (mettā, friendliness), and we shall not give in to hatred. On the contrary, we shall live projecting thoughts (feelings) of universal love to those very persons, making them as well as the whole world the objects of our thoughts of universal love -- thoughts that have grown great, exalted, and measureless. 

"We shall dwell radiating these thoughts void of hostility and ill will.' It is in this way, meditators, that one should train oneself.
 
"Meditators, if one should keep this instruction on the Parable of the Saw constantly in mind, do you see any mode of speech, subtle or gross, that you could not endure?"
 
"No, venerable sir."
 
"Therefore, meditators, one should keep this instruction on the Parable of the Saw constantly in mind. That will conduce to the well-being and happiness of all for long indeed."
 
That is what the Blessed One said. Delighted, those meditators acclaimed the Teaching (Dharma) of the Blessed One.
  • COMMENTARY: How could the Buddha say such a pie-in-the-sky thing? First, when one realizes that ultimately there is no self, no ego, nothing to cling to, it is possible to behave in a universal way. But more down to earth, this instruction follows the Buddha's advice to his disciples to endure the abusive speech of others. Why should they endure it? The Buddha says one should even endure being painfully tortured and murdered without becoming angry -- which only harms the angry one. This being the case, keeping this instruction in mind, how hard would it be to endure mere words? It would be easy, the audience responds. Therefore, keep this instruction in mind.

Thursday, 16 January 2014

"I want to kill!" - This American Life (audio)

Wisdom Quarterly; "Adam," Sarah Koenig, Ira Glass, ThisAmericanLife.comJan. 10, 2014
"No apparent motive, just kill and kill again/Survive my brutal thrashing, I'll hunt you to the end. My life's a constant battle, the rage of many men. Homicidal maniac!" - Slayer "Kill Again"

 
Adam is a killer, and he knows it. He went to kill in Afghanistan -- with bloodlust inculcated in him by American military training during bootcamp. He is the first person to honestly speak about it. Fortunately, he did it on public radio.
 
SHOW 515: Good Guys
Lots of men think of themselves as "good guys." But what does it actually take to be one, to be a truly good guy?

In 2009, a U.S. soldier ("Adam") contacted "This American Life." He offered to send audio dispatches from his military deployment in Afghanistan.
 
He wanted to do a story about what it is really like to go to war and to kill. What he learned when he was over there as a soldier [in the service of America's military-industrial complex] was way more personal and honest than anyone expected.
 
Even Adam had not planned to say as much as he did about how he was trained in bootcamp to WANT and look forward to killing people. He began as an older liberal among young, closed minded, gung ho killers.
 
War crimes, dishonor, moral injury, suicide
Although Sarah Koenig claims Adam never did get to kill anyone, it is clear he did: He killed by shooting humans he was invading, violating, and terrorizing. He shot alongside other Americans and saw targeted victims die but without being able to be sure that it was due to his gunfire.
  • PLAY AUDIO
  • WARNING: Story may not be appropriate for children.
More than gang killings, Adam called in airstrikes that got many people killed. He lusted after killing unarmed prisoners in his custody. He thought of executing them and shooting noncombatant civilians for no reason other than he had the power to. But he resisted like most other soldiers because he and they feared repercussions if they were caught killing without justification. It was fear of reprisal rather than respect for life that kept him and his fellow soldiers from killing more men, women, and children.
 
Now that he is back in America, he looks forward to being given an excuse to kill someone stateside. He needs a kill under his belt, which is not anything he discusses with VA doctors. He does not consider himself exceptional or psychopathic. In fact, he is sure other veterans kill and like it. Like other soldiers, he has discussed these facts with them. But they ordinarily never talk about it outside of the military. Producer Sarah Koenig explains (20 mins). WAR

Thursday, 26 September 2013

The Illuminati, Conspiracies, Obama... (video)

Johnathan Davis, singer for the band Korn, does not think highly of our "puppet" President Obama or the war path he continually leads us on.

Ke$ha for $atan (french.fansshare.com)
The world of "conspiracies" is fun. It's true, too. But just uttering the word makes it all all right. We stop paying attention. It's our Pavlovian conditioned response, the way we have been trained. Dalai Lama was once a CIA "operative"? Conspiracy. Oh, okay. JFK shot by agents of the military industrial complex? Conspiracy. Oh, okay. The "Illuminati" are a self-serving club of elitists in Hollywood, the military, industry (multinational corporations), and government? 

Another pawn in the Big Pentagram's game
Conspiracy. Oh, okay. Kate Middleton was never pregnant, or she may have been, but certainly did not have that baby (Prince Georgie) by ordinary means; one can see how abashed she is about lying or participating in this charade, but that is the price of fame and power in a corrupt world of politics and money, genocide and hegemony. Incest among nobility to maintain their monarchy is nothing new, and no one thinks Prince William has any power to stand up to the power he inherits. England did not get where it got by playing nice and we, as the USA, are its superpower offspring. What if off-planet entities rule not directly but through humans in positions of power, thus making it vital that bloodlines (with hybrid "divine" DNA) be maintained?

Paris Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson's daughter, wanted to warn us
of the Illuminati agenda, calling attention with a half-hearted suicide bid.

"Buddhist" Mass Murderer Alexis?
Aaron Alexis by remote control (wiki commons)
Melissa Melton (Activist Post) has another explanation for the military-style carnage from the US militant and presumably Buddhist Aaron Alexis, who went down in US history as the "Navy Yard shooter." What if his apparently intentional and irrational actions that day had a much more sinister explanation in covert activity, propaganda, and experimental influence on soldiers just as Alexis himself reported to police was happening BEFORE the shooting ever took place.

Alexis was being electronically harassed by a team of military-industrial operatives determined to cause mayhem, fear (state-sponsored terrorism), and carnage through an "experimental agent" (aka patsy) just as they have in so many previous cases.
 
Occupy the MIC (military-industrial complex)
We look for comforting causes solely in the susceptible individual and dismiss out of hand the social and conspiratorial forces at work. What has secretive science become capable of with all our DARPA and similar technology militarized to promote war, discredit opposition, and turn the world in directions that advantage the Pentagon (the US military) and the world's real "movers and shakers"(multinational corporations or "industry," the mainstream infotainment media, Big Pharma, privatized prison companies, etc.)? Oh, look, Justin Bieber! Kanye West! Boobs! Never mind the men in the business suits and camouflage.

Oh no, not Obama, too
Obama-Apologist Earl Ofari Hutchinson (pasadenaweekly.com)
President B.S. Obama, the military-industrial complex's most useful mouthpiece ever
   
The Republican Party is a bundle of politically cynical [nuts full of] contradictions. Even before Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul’s 13-hour Senate filibuster against President Obama’s drone war, various GOP politicos took shots at the president for overreaching on national security.
  
Obama’s been lambasted for failing to close Gitmo [like he swore he would] and his presumed willingness to continue having CIA and counterintelligence forces [illegally spy on Americans and] wage overt and covert war in Afghanistan after the final troop withdrawal.
 
Revoke Obama's Peace Prize (rootsaction.com)
 
This is the same GOP ["Grand Old Party"] that, from the moment Obama announced his presidential candidacy in 2007, did everything possible to tar him as a commander in chief who would be a marshmallow on national defense and, more damaging, stand down on Bush’s [endless] war on [a tactic known vaguely as] terrorism.
 
The attack was a typical tactic from the GOP’s playbook to sully Democrats on national security. [We'll show those rightwing Republicans who's tough on crime, downright reactionary on eliminating civil rights, and willing to go medieval on terrorism!]
 
GOP Presidents Reagan, Bush Sr., and especially George W. Bush in 2004 in his reelection fight with Democratic presidential foe [and fellow Yale Skull & Bones member] Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry [now proving himself a greater killer than Bush Jr. as Sec'y of State], used this ploy masterfully against their Democratic opponents. More